This article supplements Mark's interview. It discusses the SAT changes that will appear in 2016, and provides advice for students who are preparing to take the SAT and/or ACT in 2014 and 2015.
“Sometimes in the past, there’s been a feeling that tests (i.e., the SAT or ACT) were measuring some sort of ineffable entity such as intelligence, whatever that might mean. Or ability, whatever that might mean. What this is is a clear message that good hard work is going to pay off and achievement is going to pay off.”
-- William Fitzsimmons, longtime Dean of Admissions and financial aid at Harvard, the primary author of a 2008 report that criticized the current version of the SAT.
As you may have heard, the SAT is changing. The SAT test that students take in 2016 will be different, though it’s not exactly clear how different, than the one students take today. You can read the full story behind the changes to the SAT here.
In this article we’ll summarize some of the reasons for the changes, explain the major changes that are going to be implemented, and more importantly, show what students taking the test today can learn from the debate to help them excel on the ACT and SAT tests they’ll be taking in 2014 and 2015 – before any changes actually occur.
It’s important to understand that while the above quote (the quote with which we started this blog article) may accurately reflect the concerns of students, parents, and educators, the current version of the SAT, the one students are taking in 2014, is not actually trying to measure “innate intelligence” or “raw ability" in a way that the new SAT will not. Both the current version and the newer version will, more or less, attempt to predict ability to succeed in college.
However, one of the problems with the current version of the SAT is the fact that it isn’t exactly clear what it is trying to measure. Different representatives from the College Board have been quoted with slightly different answers about what it is actually testing. But I think it’s fair to say that the current version of the SAT, while flawed in ways we’ll discuss in this article, like the proposed new version, is intended to:
Here’s a quote on the current version of the SAT from Jenny Krugman, Vice President, Southern Region, of the College Board, which administers the SAT test:
“With individual grades and curricula varying widely from school to school, admissions officers need a way to determine what you know and predict whether you’ll succeed at college. A standardized assessment is an important tool for comparing students from different educational experiences…best predictor of college success is a student’s GPA and SAT scores combined. But the test is only one of many factors that colleges consider,”
She goes on to say that –
“The best preparation for standardized tests is to take challenging, college preparatory courses in high school and study hard. That advice should be printed in 500-point type and underlined about 20 times.”
So, the current version of the SAT is supposed to predict success in college, provide a level playing field for measuring across different educational backgrounds, and reflect the learning and work that a student has put into his or her education.
There are a few major problems with the current version of the SAT that are being addressed with the re-design:
In sum, while the current version of the SAT is meant to predict the probability of success in college across students from varying academic backgrounds, in practice, you can score higher on it by learning some specific test taking strategies. As a result, those with higher family incomes, those able to invest in SAT test prep classes and private SAT tutors, tend to be much better positioned to do well on the SAT. This seems to generally be true.
All that said, at MyGuru, we like to reiterate again and again and again that while the SAT and the ACT, the current versions, can appear very tricky, and while the above problems do exist, the developers of these tests are generally very transparent about what is covered on them. Perhaps in 1926 when the SAT was created the idea was to create some sort of IQ test that you couldn’t prepare for, but that hasn’t been the case for a long time. The College Board or ACT.org doesn’t hide what’s on the tests, and most $25 test prep books do cover most of the major concepts on the SAT and ACT. So, with the right mindset and the right type of focused practice, above average performance for anyone that’s worked hard in school and received good grades should be possible, regardless of annual family income.
But certainly, the above problems are real, and the SAT is addressing them, starting in 2016.
The proposed changes more or less mirror the problems stated above, and are meant to ensure that the more you’ve learned in high school about the types of ideas likely to be covered in college, the better you’ll do on the SAT. The changes, of course, are also meant to ensure that a higher family income doesn’t do such a good job of increasing the chances you’ll do well on the SAT relative to anyone else. The changes includes:
In general, it’s hard to argue against any of these changes. They seem sound, and clearly push the test in a direction that makes sense for almost all parties involved. Everyone wants a clear test that measures skills required to succeed in college: analytical ability, reading comprehension, critical thinking, problem solving, writing, etc.
There are seven simple insights to take away from the discussion of the SAT redesign that can help students taking the SAT in 2014, 2015, or any version of the ACT, today.